<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RSS Resync</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.adampieniazek.com/blog/rss-resync/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.adampieniazek.com/blog/rss-resync/</link>
	<description>A home for my ideas and experiences related to college, business, technology, sports and more.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 22:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Adam Pieniazek</title>
		<link>http://www.adampieniazek.com/blog/rss-resync/#comment-10207</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Pieniazek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 21:07:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adampieniazek.com/blog/rss-resync/#comment-10207</guid>
		<description>Great question. As far as I can tell there'd be virtually no difference on your end.

The feedburner advantage is on my side in terms of allowing people to subscribe to my feed via e-mail via feedburner, taking traffic off my servers and for tracking readership. 

I'm subscribed to both versions of the feed, the feed direct from this site and the feedburner one, and the direct feed always properly connected to relative links and will continue to properly link to the absolute urls. My newsreader, NetNewsWire, actually seemed to interpret both correctly but internal links at feedburner.com would result in errors.

FYI, if anyone is wondering what the difference is, in the html code a relative url would like this:

/tag/bike/

and an absolute url:

http://www.adampieniazek.com/tag/bike/

The problem with the relative urls and feedburner (or any other site that syndicated my feed, facebook for instance) is that feedburner (or any other site) would interpret the relative url as coming from feedburner, hence you'd get an error page that 

http://www.feedburner.com/tag/bike/

doesnt exist.

So now that I'm using the full address for internal links every source that pulls my RSS feed will link back here correctly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great question. As far as I can tell there&#8217;d be virtually no difference on your end.</p>
<p>The feedburner advantage is on my side in terms of allowing people to subscribe to my feed via e-mail via feedburner, taking traffic off my servers and for tracking readership. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m subscribed to both versions of the feed, the feed direct from this site and the feedburner one, and the direct feed always properly connected to relative links and will continue to properly link to the absolute urls. My newsreader, NetNewsWire, actually seemed to interpret both correctly but internal links at feedburner.com would result in errors.</p>
<p>FYI, if anyone is wondering what the difference is, in the html code a relative url would like this:</p>
<p>/tag/bike/</p>
<p>and an absolute url:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.adampieniazek.com/tag/bike/">http://www.adampieniazek.com/tag/bike/</a></p>
<p>The problem with the relative urls and feedburner (or any other site that syndicated my feed, facebook for instance) is that feedburner (or any other site) would interpret the relative url as coming from feedburner, hence you&#8217;d get an error page that </p>
<p><a href="http://www.feedburner.com/tag/bike/">http://www.feedburner.com/tag/bike/</a></p>
<p>doesnt exist.</p>
<p>So now that I&#8217;m using the full address for internal links every source that pulls my RSS feed will link back here correctly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.adampieniazek.com/blog/rss-resync/#comment-10198</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 19:53:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adampieniazek.com/blog/rss-resync/#comment-10198</guid>
		<description>I've just been using...
http://www.adampieniazek.com/feed/
... for the RSS feed. What advantages does feedburner have?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve just been using&#8230;<br />
<a href="http://www.adampieniazek.com/feed/">http://www.adampieniazek.com/feed/</a><br />
&#8230; for the RSS feed. What advantages does feedburner have?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.401 seconds -->
